Evaluating the Reading Components of B1 Level Textbooks

The case of Connect B1 and Incredible 5


  • ALIKI KASKANI EFL Teacher at the Merchant Marine Academy, Epirus, Greece
  • MAKRINA-NINA ZAFIRI Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Center of Foreign Languages, Academic Associate at the Hellenic Open University, Teacher Trainer at the Greek National Training Center of ASPAITE in Thessaloniki, Greece




B1 Level, Component, Evaluation, Reading Component, Checklist, Interviews


This study aims at evaluating two popular B1 level textbooks which are currently used both in Foreign Language Centers in Greece and in private tuition, namely Connect B1 and Incredible 5. They are evaluated with reference to the reading component based on criteria set in a preconstructed checklist and through interviews. Fifty respondents-teachers working both in the private sector and in the public sector completed the checklist. Eight interviews were also conducted. The evaluation aims at finding to what extent the reading component of the two books meets the criteria of the checklist, as well as to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the reading texts and tasks of the particular books in order to offer suggestions for improvement and, thus, to offer maximum gains both for students and teachers. This paper rounds off with the limitations of the research and proposals for further research.


Alamri, A. A. M. (2008). An Evaluation of the Sixth Grade English Language Textbook for Saudi Boys’ Schools. MA Thesis, King Saud University.

Arkian, A. (2008). Topics of reading passages in ELT Coursebooks: What do our students really read? The Reading Matrix, vol.8, No.2, September 2008. Retrieved October 27, 2016 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506222.pdf.

Ayakli, C.& Karavas, K. (2004).Course Design and Evaluation. Approaches to Syllabus Design, vol. 2. Hellenic Open University, Patra.

Bakke, M. H. (2010). Teaching reading in EFL-instruction. What are teachers’ attitudes towards reading in EFL-instruction and how is it taught in class? UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Våren 2010. Retrieved January 10, 2017 from https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/32416/MasteroppgavexixEngelskdidaktikkxxMargrethexH.xBakke.pdf?sequence=2

Berns, M. (2013) Contexts of Competence: Social and Cultural Considerations in Communicative Language Teaching. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

Birch, B. M. (2002). English L2 Reading: Getting to the Bottom. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Blair, M. & McCormick, K. (2009).Connect B1. Burlington Books

Bujang, N. B. (2004). The role of schema activation in the pre-reading stage of reading comprehension in the ESL classroom. Final year project submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Education with Honours (ESL). Faculty of Cognitive Science and Human Development. Universiti Malaysia Sarawat.

Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching.A guide for practioners. New York: Routledge.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K.(2013). Research Methods in Education. Routledge Falmer, Taylor Francis Group 5th Edition.

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. (2001). Language Policy Unit, Strasbourg. Retrieved November 11, 2017 from www.coe.int/lang-CEFR

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Heinemann.

Daskalos, K. & Ling, J. J. . (2005). Authentic texts or adapted texts – That is the question! The use of authentic and adapted texts in the study of English in two Swedish upper secondary schools and a study of student and teacher attitudes towards these texts. Malmö högskolaLärarutbildningen 60 p SOL. Retrieved May 02, 2017 from http://dspace.mah.se/bitstream/handle/2043/1964/authenticandadapted.pdf

Denscombe, M. (2007). The Good Research Guide: For Small Scale Social Research. (3rdEds), Buckingham, Open University Press.

Dikko, M. (2016). Establishing Construct Validity and Reliability: Pilot Testing of a Qualitative Interview for Research in Takaful (Islamic Insurance). The Qualitative Report, 21(3): 521-528. Retrieved August 02, 2017 from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss3/6

Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: construction, administration, and processing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Evans, V. & Dooley, J. (2013). Incredible 5 (3). Express Publishing.

Gabrielatos, C. (2000). The Coursebook as a flexible tool. Issues in ELT: Persistent Problems, Practical Solutions. TESOL Greece Special Event, Hellenic American Union, Greece, 22 October 2000.

Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials & authenticity in Foreign Language Learning. Tokyo university, Japan. Retrieved January 11, 2017 from https://scholar.google.gr/scholar?q=Gilmore,+A.+(2007).+Authentic+materials+and+authenticity+in+foreign+language+learning.+Language+Teaching+40,+97-118.&hl=e

Godfred, Dr A. (2017). Research Instruments for Data Collection. KNUST Gh. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from http://campus.educadium.com/newmediart/file.php/137/Thesis_Repository/recds/assets/TWs/UgradResearch/ResMethgen/files/notes/resInstrsem1.pdf

Grellet, F. (1981). Developing Reading Skills: a practical Guide to Reading Comprehension Exercises. Cambridge University Press.

Guariento, W. & Morley, J. (2001). “Text and Task Authenticity in the EFL Classroom” in ELT Journal 55(4): 347-353

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. (3rd ed.). Essex: Longman.

Heyneman, P. S. (2006).The Role of Textbooks in a Modern System of Education: Towards High Quality Education for all. Vanderbilt University.

Hopkins, D. (1989). Evaluation for School Development. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Howarth, P. (2006). Making reading communicative. Teaching English, British Council, BBC. Retrieved February 06, 2017 from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/making-reading-communicative

Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching Second Language Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jimenez, I. A. (2007). Selecting Materials Wisely. Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica.

Johnsen, E. (1993). Textbooks in the Kaleidoscope: A Critical Survey of Literature and Research on Educational Texts. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, Translated by Linda Sivesind.

Joppe, M. (2000). The Research Process. Retrieved February 25, 2017 from http://www.ryerson.ca/~mjoppe/rp.htm

Kajornboon, A. B. (2005).Using interviews as research instruments. Language Institute, Chulalongkorn University. CULI Publications 2005-2009. Retrieved January 17, 2017 from http://www.culi.chula.ac.th/research/publications/4%20Research%20and%20%20Academic%20Ariticles.pdf

Karamouzian, F.M. (2010). “A Post-Use Evaluation of Current Reading. Comprehension Textbooks Used in TEFL Programs”. The Iranian EFL Journal, Volume 6 (4): 24-62.

Koda, K. (2007). “Reading and Language Learning: Crosslinguistic Constraints on Second Language Reading Development”. Language Learning: 1-44.

Kvale, S. (2003). “The psychoanalytic interview as inspiration for qualitative research”. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: 275– 297). Washington, USA: American Psychological Association.

Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry 2006; 12; 480. Retrieved November 02, 2016 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077800406286235

Lincoln, Y. S., &Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Longhurst, R. (2010) Semi-structured Interviews and Focus Groups, In Clifford, French & Valentine (Eds) Key Methods in Geography (2ndEds) London, Sage

Manuel, J. & Brindley, S. (2012). Teenagers and Reading. Literary heritages, cultural contexts and contemporary reading practices. Wakefield Press AATE.

Maree, K. (2008) First Steps in Research, (4th Ed), Pretoria, Van Schaik Publishers.

Marinaccio, J. (2012). The Most Effective Pre-reading Strategies for Comprehension. St. John Fisher College. Fisher Digital Publications Education Masters Ralph C.

Md Mesbahul, H. (2010). Do Pre-reading Activities Help Learners Comprehend a Text Better? Dissertation Submitted to the Department of English and Humanities Of BRAe University. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from http://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/bitstream/handle/10361/763/Md%20Mesbahul%20Huq.PDF?sequence=4

Miller, P. (2007). “The role of phonology in the word decoding skills of poor readers: Evidence from individuals with prelingual deafness and diagnosed dyslexia”. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19: 385-408.

McDonough, J, & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and Methods in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell

Mieckley, J. (2005). ESL Textbook Evaluation checklist. The Reading Matrix, vol. 5, No. 2, September 2005. Retrieved November 02, 2016 from http://www.readingmatrix.com/reading_projects/miekley/project.pdf.

Ozturk, E. (2007). A suggested writing syllabus for students at proficiency level B-2 vantage defined in common European framework of reference for languages. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Prasad, S., Ajith R., Eeshoo R. (2001). Developing Hypothesis and Research Questions.500 Research Methods September 18TH 2001. Retrieved January 16, 2017 from http://www.public.asu.edu/~kroel/www500/hypothesis.pdf

Rea-Dickins, P. and Germaine K. (2001). Purposes for Evaluation. In Hall D. and Hewings A. (eds.). Innovation in English Language Teaching. London: Open University and Routledge.

Reinders, H., & Lewis, M. (2008). Materials evaluation and teacher autonomy. In T. Lamb, & H.Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses, pp.205-215. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton, N. C., Ormston, R., (2014). Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Science Students & Researchers. Second Edition. Sage Publications, Inc.

Rubdy, R. (2003). Selection of Materials. In Tomlinson, B. (ed.) Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: Continuum, pp 37-57.

Sacha, A. B. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix Vol. 6, No. 2, September 2006. Retrieved November 29, 2016 from www.readingmatrix.com/articles/berardo/article.pdf.

Siemens, G. (2014). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. DSpace. Retrieved October 10, 2016 from https://er.dut. ac.za/handle/123456789/69.

Simensen, A. M. (2007). Teaching a Foreign Language - Principles and Procedures (2 ed.). Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.

Skogen, M. (2013).Reading in CLIL and in regular EFL classes: to what extent do they differ in reading proficiency and strategy use? How do CLIL and EFL students differ with regard to reading proficiency? How do CLIL and EFL students differ with regard to reading strategy use? UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Våren 2013. Retrieved January 10, 2017 from https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/36657/Skogen_Master.pdf?sequence=1

Susser , B. & Robb , Th. N. (1990). “EFL extensive Reading Instruction: Research and Procedure”. JALT Journal, Vol.12, No.2 (November 1990).

Teijlingen, E. R., & Hundley, V. (2001). The importance of pilot studies. Social Research Update, 35

Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: Continuum.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2008). English Language Learning Materials: A Critical Review. London: Continuum.

Tovani, C. (2000). I read it, but I don’t get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers. Portland, ME: Steinhouse.

Trim, J. (2011). Using the CEFR: Principles of Good Practice. October 2011. University of Cambridge. ESOL Examinations

Tsiplakides, I. (2011). Selecting an English Coursebook: Theory and Practice. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol.1, No. 7, pp 758-764, July 2011. 2011 Academy Publisher Manufactured in Finland.

Tyler, R. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). “Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge”. Learning and Instruction, 10 (4): 311-330.

Watson, R., Atkinson, I., & Rose, K. (2007). “Pilot studies: To publish or not” [Editorial]. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16: 619–620

Weir, C., & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Williams, D. (1983). “Developing Criteria for textbook evaluation”, ELT Journal, 37: 251-255.

Wilson, Jr. School of Education 5-2012 St. John Fisher College. Retrieved January 11, 2017 from http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1209&context=education_ETD_masters

Wong, P. W. L. (2011). Textbook evaluation: A Framework for Evaluating the Fitness of the Hong Kong New Secondary School (NSS) Curriculum. Department of English City University of Hong Kong. Retrieved May 05, 2017 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Thesis/Thesis-Wong.pdf.




How to Cite

KASKANI, A. and ZAFIRI, M.-N. (2021) “Evaluating the Reading Components of B1 Level Textbooks: The case of Connect B1 and Incredible 5”, Journal of English Language and Literature (ISSN: 2368-2132), 15(1), pp. 1319–1338. doi: 10.17722/jell.v15i1.1231.